Tag Archives: Jerry Brown

sf gate’s phil bronstein dispels the plot behind the disappearing op-ed. CCWC R: thanks phil

Tangled web: The case of the disappearing Newsom Op-Ed

Then along came a momentary tempest about a column I’d written for yesterday’s Chronicle that hadshown up briefly on SFGate, then disappeared. Of course erasers don’t work on the web, so the readable shadow of the column wasfully twitterizedand otherwisepassed aroundin an electronic heartbeat. Calls and emails came from the Bay Guardian, theSF Appeal, Gawker, sfist, KQED radio, etc. all asking if the thing had been censored because it was critical of a local politician.

Having been around awhile, I knew that some kind of ham-handed deletion for political reasons, juicy as it sounds, wasn’t the thief here. There was no artificially rippling flag in this scenario. It was human error, not intent.

Here’s what Chronicle editor Ward Bushee had to say:

 Phil’s column was created from the start to be a print-only column in the Monday Chronicle. When we first started talking about the column, Phil and I agreed to try this as a low-stakes experiment. The experiment is not indicative of any larger plan by the Chronicle, SFGate or Hearst. It is not the start of a premium content initiative or a pay wall. But it was designed to test how different content models can serve different audiences. Each week Phil reaches a significant online audience with his blog, which is not available in print. By introducing a column by Phil that is different in its content and mission from his blog, we can see if it adds value to the printed paper by giving readers unique content that they could not get free online. As with any experiment, it will be evaluated at some point to see if we stick with it or change it.

Unfortunately, the brief appearance of the column on SFGate this week made some people think we were pulling it off because of the content. That was not the case. The column was posted for a short time on SFGate through a misunderstanding and then pulled down when it was discovered.SFGate Editor Vlae Kershner echoed that last part. A Gate staffer, he said, “didn’t know it was supposed to be embargoed and put it up.”

Read Full Article Here.

Thanks for forwarding the update Phil.  We didn’t detect any manipulation; we just thought it was strange.  Nevertheless, good piece and we still agree with your POV as it relates to the question, “where’s the list of Gavin’s young contemporaries who might actually fill out those size 14 public service shoes in interesting and effective ways with help from the pros?”

Keep on writing…

sf gate’s phil bronstein asks the question we have been asking since february 15th

Where is our next generation of leaders?

Gavin Newsom is our shining hope? Really? Beyond his own self-generated image of brilliant wonkiness and charm, where’s the list of Gavin’s young contemporaries who might actually fill out those size 14 public service shoes in interesting and effective ways with help from the pros?

I found the answer to that question late last week in a San Francisco SoMa alleyway when I grabbed coffee with Biz Stone, co-founder of Twitter. He and his Bay Area tech colleagues are where the can-do skill has gone.

Despite the hacking of his company’s digital files (including personal stuff) and the resulting Web firestorm of back-and-forth righteous indignation, Stone was the model of calm.

“It was definitely a little creepy,” he said of the document theft and outing, which he thought bordered on criminal. But “it’s (also) a chance to show who you are. I don’t have anything to hide. I won’t call a crisis management team to ‘stop’ the news. I personally believe we are good people, but if we do stupid s-, I want journalists and bloggers to call me out.”

How refreshing is that? Whatever your feelings about Twitter, this young pioneer has actually served the public by giving a voice to gossip and also to Iranian protesters and real-time witnesses to news.

It was hard not to compare and contrast the guy with Newsom. In Twitter, Stone has created a profound new platform that inspires people, unlike Newsom, whose own platform is like cotton candy and who leases space on Twitter to spin it.

If Stone won’t run for office, how about someone from Google/Facebook or anywhere else our next generation of potent geniuses are hiding out?

Read Full Article Here.

CCWC member paul hogarth on “tenant” demographic and “opening” in the california governor’s race

California Tenants Have No Friends in Governor’s Race 

Last Friday at 5:00 p.m. (which he’s apt to do when releasing bad news), San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom vetoed three pro-tenant ordinances designed to help renters facing hard times. He even nixed a relatively mild proposal to limit “banked” rent increases to 8% – despite this being consistent with existing policies at the Mayor’s Office of Housing. Newsom’s record on tenant issues in San Francisco has always been bad, and his latest act does not bode well for next year’s statewide elections. California’s 14 million renters need a champion in the Governor’s Mansion after six years of a hostile Republican Administration, but Newsom currently only has one opponent for the Democratic primary – state Attorney General Jerry Brown. Based on his record as Mayor of Oakland, Brown can be counted on to be just as anti-tenant – if not worse – than Newsom. There is no excuse why a deep blue state like California can’t have a pro-tenant Governor, and the current field of Democratic candidates creates an opening for a new person to jump into the fray.

Read Full Article Here.

ca progress reports’ schrag on NYT’s leibovich

California’s Five Wannabes

Leibovich’s piece is titled, “Who Can Possibly Govern California?” but neither he nor his candidates seem to have much interest in answering the much more important more important questions about how it could be done. What he and the Times have in effect accomplished, both in the text and the in accompanying photos of the candidates, all nicely dressed and shot in nice California outdoor settings, is to further reinforce voter contempt for the state’s would-be leaders.

But finally what’s most striking is that it really isn’t about the candidates, much less the state, but about Leibovich – how he traveled around California, chatted with them, went with them to some PR events, and sat schmoozing with Arnold in the governor’s smoking tent – God, how often do we have to hear about that tent?

Where are California and the people who are feeling the pain – the school kids and teachers in hopelessly underfunded schools, the children who are losing their health care, the minimum-wage working mothers struggling to pay their child care, the students who are losing their university grants? Is all this really about nothing?

Read Full Article Here.


pasadena star-news’ larry wilson chimes in on governor’s race and prop 13. CCWC R: Larry join the discussion.

Larry Wilson: Calling all candidates for governor

It doesn’t much matter whether as a pol or pundit or curmudgeonly homeowner you’ve saluted Proposition 13 for three decades now. When the gavel goes down on this California Constitutional Convention we’ve all agreed is necessary, all bets are off.

Read full article here.

Larry, join us next Tuesday for lunch!

So our members, followers and readers might gain a better understanding of Prop 13, we are holding a “twitter talk” next Tuesday, 07/14/09.  The topic tag inside twitter is #TTprop13.  Please join us for a lunchtime discussion from 12:00 – 1:00 PST and share your ideas on how best we can change Sacramento.

fast company on the sf mayor, “would you hire him?”

Gavin Newsom Wants to Be Governor of California. Would You Hire Him?

Newsom needs to prove that he can garner the support of business titans both to fill his coffers and to help him make his case. One local CEO echoed a common refrain: “What’s he done? He’s never here, and when he is, he’s grandstanding.” And the venture capitalists I’ve spoken to aren’t sure they’ve seen their candidate yet. “This is a leadership issue,” says Mitchell Kertzman, managing director at Hummer Winblad Venture Partners. With the onerous budget-making process and the remnants of Prop 13 (which limits property taxes) creating funding logjams, “someone has to be courageous and modify these things.” If California were a business? “I’d wipe the slate clean,” says Kertzman, “bring the valuation down at near zero, and agree to start again. But this isn’t Chrysler or a startup we’re talking about.”

Fixing government by making it run like a business is the strategy Newsom originally campaigned on, and it’s the one Whitman seems to be sticking with. Long married and congenitally buttoned up, Whitman is emphasizing her “strong values” and business record while she formulates an expanding portfolio of views and solutions. “Growing the economy, creating jobs will be a big priority,” she told me recently, reverting effortlessly to her talking points.

Newsom, who has business credentials of his own, concedes that in a campaign, “you can usually get away with the ‘I’m going to run government like a business’ thing. It’s an applause line.” And then, he says, you get into office. “It’s a civil-service system. It’s not just a right/left advocacy thing. It’s nuanced. And it takes time not just to fire people, but to hire them.” You can either legislate change or go to the voters. By then, new economic realities hit. “And you have to react to that,” he says. “You have less influence outside your realm than you think.”

Read full article here.

CCWC is hosting a candidate forum on SF Mayor Newsom on Tuesday 07/21/09 in twitter.  Please join us at #TTnewsom for lunch, 12:00 – 1:00 PST, and share your thoughts.  Would you hire him?

coming this sunday: nyt magazine…”who can possibly govern california?”

not particularly flattering for the current field of candidates...worth a read

New York Times
July 5, 2009
Magazine Preview

Who Can Possibly Govern California?

Gavin Newsom, the mayor of San Francisco, has an emergency button under his desk that was installed 30 years ago after former City Supervisor Dan White entered City Hall through a window and fatally shot Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk. Not knowing what the button was for, Newsom kept pushing it on his first day in office, only to have three sheriffs rush in repeatedly.

Newsom says he has not had occasion to press the button since, although the mayor admits he is tempted to whenever meetings drag on or when reporters ask him annoying questions or when he becomes bored, something that happens easily.

I was sitting in Newsom’s office in May, and the mayor was fidgeting behind his desk, which is neat except for a few side-by-side stacks of collated papers. These are what Newsom calls his CliffsNotes, part of an elaborate system of self-education he developed over several years.

Newsom struggled with severe dyslexia as a child and compensated by rereading, underlining, bracketing and scrawling comments in the margins. “I just butcher a book,” he explained to me. “Everything I underline I assume is important to me.” Interns type up what Newsom has underlined and produce a set of notes for him. “Sometimes I will make CliffsNotes of my CliffsNotes,” Newsom said. He described the practice as “really pathetic.” But it works for him and illustrates a larger point about people with learning disabilities: when a person struggles to learn in conventional ways, he said, you adapt “in ways that can nurture creative solutions.” Doing so can also promote “audacious goals that many would dismiss as irrational.”

That may well be the best description of Newsom’s latest ambition: to succeed Arnold Schwarzenegger as the governor of California even as the state is in the midst of one of its recurring cataclysms. They come along once or twice a decade, sparked by natural disaster or some fiasco of overcrowding (prisons, schools, roads) or shortage (water, energy, cash) or civic rebellion (taxes, cops, Gray Davis). California always seems to produce more spectacle than anywhere else in the country, and that goes for its meltdowns too. Calamity is just part of the equation here, as if God gave California so much glamour and grandeur and great weather that he had to throw in some apocalyptic menace to provide a little balance. Earthquakes, say. Or Sacramento.

Californians, would-be governors included, have learned to take crises in stride. “People have been declaring this place on the brink of extinction for decades,” said Newsom, who was born in San Francisco and reared in the city and in the adjacent county of Marin. When I visited him in his office, Newsom, who is 41, had just finished rereading his notes on one of his favorite books about the state, “Coast of Dreams: California on the Edge, 1990-2003,” by Kevin Starr. Newsom’s CliffsNotes for “Coast of Dreams” fill 77 pages. He gave me a set, after leafing through them to make sure he had not written anything embarrassing in the margins.

“California had become . . . a reality in search of a myth that had once been believed in,” Starr writes in a passage highlighted by Newsom. “That dream, in fact, had been the first and only premise of the Schwarzenegger campaign.” Those days, in the early years of this decade, were the last time real life overwhelmed the state’s ability to govern itself — that’s when voters recalled their governor, Gray Davis, and once again looked beyond “reality,” to Hollywood, for their next savior, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Six years on, California’s political culture seems no less dysfunctional. The state’s most urgent problem is its lumbering wreck of an economy. Not surprisingly, given California’s size, more people have lost jobs and more homes have been foreclosed on and more big banks have failed here in the last year than in any other state in the country. The state faces a $24 billion deficit, and Schwarzenegger recently joked that his finance director has been placed “on suicide watch.” “California’s day of reckoning is here,” Schwarzenegger said in a speech in early June, though in fact many Californians are convinced that the state is past its day of reckoning and that the governor is approaching his “end of days.” (Whatever his successes and failures, Schwarzenegger has at least nourished California politics with endless opportunities for movie allusions, double entendres and overall goofiness — some of it occasionally clever.)

Schwarzenegger still exudes a celebrity aura that transcends politics, no matter how unmanageable they are. Schoolchildren and tourists crowd hallways to glimpse him before he appears at the Capitol — scenes that resemble red-carpet openings of “Kindergarten Cop.” Shrieks announce his arrivals. “The Arnold alarm,” one Statehouse reporter called it. There was no Gray Davis alarm.

The former Mr. Universe has shrunk greatly in political stature, now that he has become ineligible for re-election (thanks to term limits), unpopular (a 33 percent approval rating) and incapable of asserting his will over an unyielding Legislature and ornery electorate. And there is a general recognition that Schwarzenegger’s substantial assets proved no match for the daunting disorder of the state’s politics, something even Schwarzenegger admitted to me recently: “The bottom line is, even me as a celebrity governor — even with that, I can’t penetrate through certain things.”

And yet, the governorship of California remains an oddly seductive job. It doesn’t matter that the office has become a graveyard of political aspiration, that Davis was actually considered a rising national star at one time. State Attorney General Jerry Brown — yes, that Jerry Brown — recently called the job of California governor “a career ender,” which is notable given that Brown, a two-term former governor, now 71, seems intent on ending his career back in that office. Indeed, Brown is a big reason that the 2010 governor’s race in California might be the most compelling political show in the nation next year. You have nationally known Democrats. You have socially moderate Republicans who favor abortion rights and, to varying degrees, gay rights (if not gay marriage itself), in a state whose traditional strains still run deep. And above all, you have a diverse and, to some degree, radically discordant group of candidates striving to win over one of the country’s most disruptive places (the California of Silicon Valley and the counterculture) and one of its most conservative (the California of Reagan, Nixon and tax revolts). “In a sense, the race to succeed Schwarzenegger is so fascinating because the competing souls of the state are all wrapped up in the candidates,” is how the Los Angeles-based Democratic strategist Bill Carrick put it. “You have the old and the new, the bizarre and the boring. Crisis does tend to bring it all to the fore.”

READ FULL ARTICLE

SFgate’s marinucci and yi get to the root causes of california’s structural failures.

If there is an upside to the failures of the current administration in Sacramento, it is the chorus coming out of the press, progressive blogs and grassroots organizations of all stripes that the time has come to fix our government.  CCWC will support the candidate who brings these reforms to the forefront of their campaign.

There are several factors that contribute to the state’s recurring inability to deliver an on-time, balanced budget. Among them:

— Partisanship: California’s gerrymandered legislative districts tend to protect incumbents and encourage more political extremes – Republicans on the right and Democrats on the left with less incentive to reach out to the political middle, much less compromise at the Capitol.

— Term limits: Proposition 140, passed in 1990, limits legislators terms to six years in the Assembly and eight in the state Senate.

— Ballot-box budgeting: Initiative-loving Californians mandated set-aside funding for all kinds of single-interest issues, from education to stem cell research.

— Prop. 13: The 1978 landmark law slashed commercial and residential property tax rates, shifting state reliance to other more volatile sources.

— The two-thirds majority rule: The Golden State is one of just three states that require a two-thirds majority vote from each legislative house to pass budgets.

Read full article here.

To all candidates considering a run, we are committed to these reforms.  We are less interested in what you have accomplished in the past and are focused squarely on what you plan to do to “fix” our government.  

calbuzz on the private moore methods survey. CCWC R: undecideds apparently poll ahead of sf mayor with 28%, which begs the question, “who is next to join this race?”

Brown vs. Newsom: The Tale of the Tape

The latest J Moore Methods survey finds Jerry Brown leading Gavin Newsom in a two-way race for the 2010 Democratic nomination for governor 46-to-26 percent.  It’s the first serious poll we know about that considers a Brown-Newsom match-up.

Calbuzz, what about undecideds who polled at 28%?  Almost one third of the democratic voters are not convinced yet, by either of these candidates.    

Among all Democrats and independents, just 41 percent agree that Newsom has “sufficient skills to be governor,” and the view of his readiness to be governor declines as voters get older: 47 percent among those 18-39 say he’s ready, compared to 44 percent among those 40-59 and 35 percent among those 60 and older.

Brown currently enjoys a huge advantage on this fundamental measure, as 69 percent of  primary voters say he’s got what it takes, which breaks down this way:  40 percent among those 18-39;  74 percent among those 40-59; and 78 percent among those 60 and older.

Moore emphasized the importance of this measure. Among voters who actually cast ballots in June 2008, Newsom scores just 39-to-23 percent compared to 77-to-8 percent for Brown.

Bottom line: To have a chance in a one-on-one primary race against Brown, Newsom is going to have to go beyond a straight generational pitch and find a way to convince large numbers of middle-age and geezer Democrats he’s got the Right (or Left) Stuff.

Calbuzz Emptor Caveats (that’s Latin for covering our ass)

1. There hasn’t been a campaign yet, and things always change when punches get thrown.

2. External events – an initiative challenge to Prop. 8 or an extraordinary Newsom registration and turnout effort among young voters – could change the makeup of the June 2010 primary electorate.

3. Time’s running short, but it’s not too late for a wild card candidate to jump in the race and scramble the dynamics.

4. Jerry’s really old.

5. Conventional wisdom is always wrong.

republican field of candidates expanding? CCWC Q: where are the change candidates?

Pro-life conservative to enter 2010 GOP gov’s race? Foy “strongly” closer to jumping in

Republican Ventura County supervisor Peter Foy — a pro-life, “strong social and fiscal conservative” — says he’s “real seriously” looking at jumping into the 2010 governor’s race.

The Simi Valley insurance executive and head of the Peter Foy Foundation told us he’ll make his decision soon — possibly in the next 30 days.

The entry of conservative Foy into the GOP gubernatorial party would be bad news for the three Republicans already in: State Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, and former Rep. Tom Campbell, who are all social moderates and pro-choice.

And it would be great news for the Democrats, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom and the likely candidate State Attorney General Jerry Brown — who would like nothing better than watching the Republicans go through a crowded, contentious primary.

villaraigosa is out – so who does this help in the current field

Just after Mayor Villaraigosa made his announcement on CNN, the Situation Room brought in Jessica Yellin, one of its national political correspondents and a native Angeleno, for a quick recap with Blitzer.

Yellin reports that both Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom see this as a boon to their respective campaigns and calls Villaraigosa’s decision a “tectonic shake up” to California’s governor’s race. Brown believes his long-time alliance with the Latino community will allow him to capitalize on Villaraigosa’s departure but Newsom thinks this will really help his outreach to younger voters since many Latino voters are young.

Or, as one of my esteemed colleagues mentioned earlier, does this open the door for another Southern California candidate to step in? The race continues to be wide open and while Villaraigosa’s decision is not entirely surprising, it does leave one to wonder where the momentum might shift.

but who will ashton and demi tweet their support for?

Variety: Hollywood gets behind candidates

Just in case things in California don’t seem strange enough to suit your own eccentric west coast palate, Variety has run an article speculating about which gubernatorial candidates will garner which Hollywood bigwig’s blessing. Such is the state of our politics.

It is almost a welcome reprieve in an intense political contest to have human interest stories pop up that add a touch of levity to the typical 24-hour news cycle of punditocracy. Think about the national attention showered down upon Carrie Prejean for her now infamous stand against same sex marriage. Here we find the US facing a serious social issue and several states, not named California, are already coming out in favor of equal rights for everyone. Somehow, in the midst of this serious debate, focus gets thrust upon a beauty pageant winner whose greatest addition to the national dialog on gay marriage, in my mind at least, is the nifty term ‘opposite marriage.’ I feel guilty bringing it up, as I believe that moment jumped the shark within a day of it occurring, but it is a prime example of the curious human element making itself known in the political world.

Back to my point, even the most somber of political junkies among us will take a moment at some point to read about the Hollywood perspective on a candidate. In California it is inevitable as the entertainment industry is a major player in our state’s economy. Some movie star will use their fame as a platform for offering support for a candidate and newspapers around the country will make it a top headline.

I am waiting for that American Idol Moment when we get to see the candidates showcased on television to a montage of moving personal clips, a contemporary but not too cutting edge soundtrack and a personal acquaintance of the candidate narrating, with great affection and gravitas, the story of the candidate’s life and career…or has it already happened and I missed it?!?

Until that moment I will wait to see who Ashton tweets his support for with an open mind.

Read Variety Article Here

hardball’s mathews, “you’re talking to a jerry brown fan”

Chris Mathews and guests discuss the Nevada Senator’s sex scandal.   Mathews comments on California’s Governor’s race.

Hardball Video Clip

Will post youtube when it becomes available.

mercury news on sf mayor in san jose, CCWC: we heard the same thing at the convention and asked delegates what they thought.

Newsom tells San Jose Rotarians that San Francisco is a model for fixing California

“If the city of San Francisco with all its dysfunctionality can do it … we can do this in the state of California,” he said,

Asked after the speech whether he was trying to address the “San Francisco flake factor” head-on, Newsom said: “I feel perfectly fine defending a city that is a rather extraordinary city in an equally extraordinary region.”

Besides, he said, the city has a long line of politicians it can from be proud of — from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to former Mayor Willie Brown to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

“Dianne Feinstein,” he said, “is hardly a flake.”

sfgate continues ag brown candidacy meme, goes meta

Another clue to 2010 race: “Jerry Brown for Governor” already on his website

Blogger friend and consultant Bob Brigham, who has been a regular on Calitics.com, says that there are lots of keywords on the Brown site, including “Governor Jerry Brown,” “Mayor Jerry Brown” and “attorney general” — but no question, the use of “Jerry Brown for Governor” was “something that caught my eye.”

His theory: While it isn’t a sure bet that he’s running, “it does mean that a gubernatorial campaign was on the minds of the people tasked with building his website.”

ag brown letter to sfgate dot com’s carla marinucci

AG Jerry Brown comes a step closer to announcing for gov: “We will build a movement”

Dear Carla,

I have had an unusual opportunity to see California State government and its political process up close for a long, long time. I had my first glimpse – in the fifties – when my father ran for attorney general and then for governor, and again when I was governor. It was profoundly different then. The schools were good, the state wasn’t broke, Republicans talked with Democrats and even voted together when it was important to do so.

The last few years, this has all changed. Acrimony and endless deficits have become the order of the day. And turning it around, especially given the financial meltdown, won’t be easy. But I am trying. I am doing everything I can as your attorney general to make sure that the law is on your side. I sued Countrywide to restructure tens of thousands of mortgages, brought actions against a myriad of scam artists who set up Ponzi schemes or ripped off consumers in various and heartless ways, I sued employers who cheated their workers and vigorously defended California’s environmental laws. Go to Fighting for You for the full story. Continue reading

ag brown advances constitutional challenge to prop 8 in federal court, “liberty interests”

does california need a one-term governor with long-term solutions?

As I sat down to write today I glanced over the litany of trials and tribulations facing the Golden State and thought back on a scene from the 1984 hit comedy Ghostbusters, in which the ghoul-fighting boys in gray are meeting with the mayor of New York to discuss the paranormal threats tearing the city apart:

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
Mayor: What do you mean, “biblical”?
Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath of God type stuff.
Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.
Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!
Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes…
Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave!
Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!

California, like NYC in the film, has ominous clouds looming on the horizon, granted of a much less supernatural origin, but some state officials seem one Stay Puft Marshmallow Man away from a full-scale panic, with the cohabitation of dogs and cats being replaced with the legal marriage of Jim’s and John’s. Disaster of epic, if not biblical, proportion is possible.

California faces a monstrous budget crisis, the kind for which publicly traded companies might seek government bailouts. Governor Schwarzenegger’s attempt to coax tax payers into shouldering a greater part of the burden was a political embarrassment and led reporters to ask the man known as The Governator whether California was governable at all. His nongermane reply to that very question makes one wonder whether the politician who still struggles to pronounce ‘California‘ had any business running it. Further fueling such speculation in some corners are his suggestion that California consider a flat tax, a move the increasingly ubiquitous Jerry Brown has supported in the past, as well as his willingness to allow the state government to come to a “grinding halt” versus taking what he sees as an ill-advised loan. His recent proposal to borrow $1.9 billion from city and county governments also caused quite a stir. These are rather unpredictable suggestions coming from a politician deemed clumsily predictable. Are these measures of desperation or is he suddenly more the pol willing to embrace the unconventional in his final year as opposed to the neophyte who began his term by rolling back the car tax – a move he now considers undoing. Arnold is free-wheeling a bit these days, throwing out all kinds of ideas he might have once felt an anathema to his political ideology and demonstrating a willingness to consider anything that might help. The reason is – he has nothing to lose. He has no re-election in his future and, though he may be lame-duck, he sounds determined not to go down without a quack.

Continue reading

LAT Q: villaraigosa’s and newsom’s private lives may collide with their political aspirations. but do voters care? CCWC A: a concrete plan for change is paramount

Two mayors make Jerry Brown look traditional

Villaraigosa and Newsom — all candidates, indeed — have the chance to educate voters about the totality of their lives, said Lehane, a strategist based in San Francisco.

In the end, as always, voters will decide. In the circuitous calculus that they employ, will the candidates’ struggles be seen as human frailty or a lack of personal discipline? Will their significant others’ websites suggest comfort with strong and independent women or seem too suggestive?

“You’re going to have positive and negative,” Lehane said. “What you want to do is emphasize your positives and minimize your negatives — and do the opposite to an opponent.”

——————————————–

CCWC will back the candidate most qualified to lead a transformational reform movement in Sacramento.  The private lives of the candidates are of no interest to us, save drug addiction, illicit conduct and the like.  The new politics Obama started at the national level attempt to end petty confrontations and foster collaboration with even the most divergent view points, moving us away from attacking people personally.  It is in this spirit, we will reject the  media’s fascination with personality and human frailty on both sides.

We will demand the same of our candidate. 

With this in mind, CCWC would like to know the values and life experiences that drive the political decisions and judgements the candidates have made in the past and compel them to campaign for our future.  We are as interested in this as we are the records of the candidates.  We are searching for a candidate with a resume as much a vision to fix Sacramento rooted in principles and acumen that are matched for the times we are in.

Mayors, all candidates, we wish you the best in your search for personal peace and happiness. 

sac bee on ag donor, CCWC Q: brand brown at a crossroads?

Jerry Brown donations tied to businessmen he’s now probing

John J. Pitney Jr., Crocker professor of politics at Claremont McKenna College, said the campaign contributions may become a problem for Brown.

“He’s built his entire career as a reformer who is independent of corporate interests,” Pitney said.

“If I were advising Brown, I’d tell him not to keep the money,” he said. “Keeping the money would be a mistake.”

Pitney said Brown could refund the donations to the firms or give them to a charity.

Robert Stern, president of the Center for Governmental Studies in Los Angeles, said he wasn’t as troubled as Pitney.

“They should be disclosed and discussed, but I don’t see a big problem, ” Stern said. “The attorney general himself is not conducting those investigations. It’s his staff.”

“People who give campaign contributions are usually people who want something. If there are charges, he may consider returning the money or turning the money over to others at that time,” added Stern, who noted that he worked for Brown for a couple of years in the 1970s.

new poll: undecided leads all candidates with 28%

Poll: Brown leads Democratic race for Calif. governor

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Legal Newsline)-California Attorney General Jerry Brown leads the Democratic race for governor, a poll indicates.

Brown, a former state governor, leads the poll with 24 percent support. Trailing is San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who had 16 percent support, and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, with 15 percent, the Probolsky Research/Capitol Weekly Poll shows.

Twenty-eight percent of Democrats surveyed said they were not sure who they planned to vote for in 2010 to succeeded Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who is barred by term limits from seeking reelection.

On the Republican side, former U.S. Rep. Tom Campbell leads with 13 percent support, while former eBay CEO Meg Whitman has 10 percent support and state Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner at 8 percent.

Sixty-four percent of Republicans surveyed said they were not sure who they would support for their party’s nomination.

“Republican voters exhibited a great deal of uncertainty, even when pressed their inclinations. That said, former Congressman Tom Campbell and former EBay CEO Meg Whitman lead the Republican line-up. Former Gov. Jerry Brown leads the Democratic line-up by a wide margin,” Probolsky Research said in its analysis.

Brown, 71, was California governor from 1975 to 1983. He was the mayor of Oakland, Calif., from 1998 to 2006, before being elected as the state’s chief legal officer in 2007. Brown unsuccessfully sought the Democratic nominations for U.S. president in 1976, 1980, and 1992.

The Probolsky Research/Capitol Weekly Poll, taken May 25 to May 29, surveyed 751 registered voters. The poll’s margin of error is plus or minus 3.7 percent.

From Legal Newsline: Reach staff reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

randy shaw, “newsom and brown: more of the same”

Progressives Bear Blame for California’s Woes

I must have missed the grassroots progressive convention that anointed Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown the Democrats’ only major Governor candidates for 2010, but with Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa likely out of the race, that’s our field. The two have much in common.

Both are closely aligned with powerful real estate interests, and have proved hostile to legislation expanding tenants rights. 

Brown staunchly opposed just cause eviction laws as Oakland’s mayor, and even vetoed a mild inclusionary housing law. He gave a blank check to real estate and development interests during his tenure in Oakland.

Newsom has backed landlords throughout his political career, and recently received a $25,000 contribution from Republican Thomas J. Coates of San Francisco’s 
Jackson Square Properties. Coates spent almost $1 million on last June’s Proposition 98, the measure that sought to eliminate rent control in California. While Newsom publicly opposed Prop 98, Coates did not donate $25,000 because he thought that a Governor Newsom would sign bills restricting the Ellis Act and expanding tenants rights.

Brown and Newsom both ignore legislative bodies other politicians, ensuring poor communication and a lack of cooperation with state Democratic leaders. Democrats who complained that Gray Davis did not build relationships with legislators will find Newsom or Brown offering more of the same. 

These are the leaders that California’s progressive community has allowed Democratic voters to choose from next June.

prop 8 war: poizner weighs in, slams ag brown

Proposition 8 Ruling Sets up California War

Gay-marriage culture battle deepens between gays, Latinos, Christians, liberals

By TIBBY ROTHMAN AND JILL STEWART, LA WEEKLY

published: May 28, 2009

The lopsided 6-1 ruling on May 26 by the California Supreme Court to uphold Proposition 8 and ban gay marriage in California was rich with irony, even if it was missed by many commentators, protesters and celebrators: The sole dissent was from Justice Carlos Moreno, who said majority voters should not be allowed to deprive a minority of fundamental rights. The court at the same time agreed, unanimously, that 18,000 marriages conducted before voters spoke last November 4 cannot be undone.Proponents of gay marriage — who hope to take their cause back to California voters next year — now must win over the tens of thousands of Latino and black voters whose socially cautious views toward family and marriage put Prop. 8 over the top in November, and whose attitudes caught the state’s politically isolated top gay-rights advocates by surprise.

Assemblyman John Perez, who represents the heavily Latino Eastside of Los Angeles and is a relatively rare openly gay Latino politician, called the ruling a setback, but told L.A. Weekly, “Every movement for social change, every movement to end discrimination, hits stumbling blocks. Today was another stumbling block but it was not a permanent impediment, it’s a temporary impediment.” He was also tremendously “heartened” by Moreno’s dissenting opinion, saying it lays the foundation for a different future.

This week’s ruling had its roots in a decision by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom to allow gay marriages in his city. He was bolstered when the California Supreme Court ruled in a 4-3 decision about a year ago that a state law defining marriage as between a man and a woman violated fundamental rights. After voters responded by approving Prop. 8, Attorney General Jerry Brown, who will face fellow Democrat Newsom in next year’s primary fight for California governor, announced he could not support voters — and joined as a plaintiff against Prop. 8.

This week, California gubernatorial hopefuls continued to joust over gay marriage. State Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, a Republican, slammed Brown’s position, saying, “If the Court had overturned Proposition 8, it would have had set a terrible legal precedent, divided Californians even further, undermined support for the judiciary and state government itself.” Political observers believe Brown will fight hard to assure that the lesser-known Newsom doesn’t own the pro-gay marriage issue.

FULL ARTICLE

ag brown: “I’ll figure it out”

Brown ready to ‘figure out’ state budget

by Dan Aiello

Bay Area Reporter

In his keynote address before Sacramento’s Stonewall Democrats last week, state Attorney General Jerry Brown discussed the state’s dire financial situation and reiterated why he believes Proposition 8 should be overturned while all but announcing his intention to run for governor.

On Tuesday, however, the state Supreme Court upheld Prop 8 in a 6-1 decision, delivering a blow to supporters of same-sex marriage. But in what was widely expected, the justices also decided that the 18,000 same-sex marriages that were performed over five months last year will stand. [See stories, page 1.]

[Updated, May 28: Brown did make brief comments on the Prop 8 decision Tuesday night.

“I want to I want to say that the court, through a very long opinion, and I have to say somewhat tortured, certainly was inconsistent in my judgment from the marriage case ruling, which really was a ringing defense of the right of same-sex couples to be included within the right of marriage,” Brown said. “And now because of the 52 percent vote that right is stripped away. I really believe that over time Californians will accord to same-sex couples this right that the court previously had upheld but now is invalidating because of Proposition 8. This is a story that has evolved, it’s changing and I would predict in the future the rights of same-sex couples will be restored.”

Brown said such closely fought social issues “aren’t solved overnight.”

Brown criticized the court further, based on its previous ruling. “I think the court took a narrow view of its job, its duty, to protect fundamental liberties,” he said. “Once the court declared that same-sex marriage was an aspect of liberty, I believe they had a duty to uphold that right, but they saw it differently.”

“It stems from the court’s belief that there are no rights outside what is written,” said Brown, who said his argument was that “The core values of equality and liberty are fundamental to our constitution.”

Brown predicted recourse will be at the ballot box. “The fact is Californians are deeply divided on same-sex marriage,” said Brown, refusing to predict the outcome of any future ballot fight. “It depends on turnout, and it depends on what happens between now and the election.”]

Brown, who received an award from the Stonewall group, served as governor in the 1970s and later as mayor of Oakland. He couldn’t help but pepper his off-the-cuff address with obscure remarks, while offering his trademark caustic criticism of the capital city to a hometown audience that wasn’t well received.

“I don’t live in Sacramento, I already did that,” said Brown. “I live in Oakland where it’s a little more exciting.”

But just as attendees began to ask each other if the attorney general was indicating he would not run for governor, Brown told the Stonewall members, many of whom work in state or legislative offices, “In case I do run for governor, I hope you solve this year’s budget crisis sometime before next year. But you know what? If you don’t, I’ll figure it out.”

The comment brought applause and many in the room believed Brown had announced his candidacy.

FULL ARTICLE HERE

griffen: sizing up villaraigosa for sf mayor

Sizing up Mistermayor’s L.A. Rival

May 21, 8:43 AM

Melissa Griffen, SF Examiner

‘When he’s on top of his game, [Los Angeles Mayor Antonio] Villaraigosa is catnip to wealthy, white, liberal voters — and that, combined with Latino voters, makes for a powerful coalition,” Democratic pollster Andre Pineda recently told me. Pineda then added that Villaraigosa, who is eyeing a run for governor but has yet to commit to the race, is far from being on top of his game.

I’m sure the thought of a race without Villaraigosa inspires awkward high-fives all around Mistermayor’s gubernatorial campaign headquarters. Despite the fact that Villaraigosa only has 1,634 followers on Twitter compared with Newsom’s 422,970, he and Newsom have been polling within a few points of each other for some time now, though neither within 10 points of state Attorney General Jerry Brown (who has 186,178 followers; I know you were wondering).

FULL ARTICLE